Instinct and Thinking in Animals

The basis of intelligence – Part 2

All animals seem to know what they need to fear, whether they be wolves, cougars, sharks or amoebas. Having instinctive responses are important to their survival; there is no question about that. But how that instinct is developed is a mystery.

As a child I was told that animals (non-human) did not think; everything that they did was through instinct. Such a claim did not satisfy me. Having been around pets and other animals all my life has given me many examples that show clearly that animals think, dream, even reason and make decisions – sometimes well, and sometimes not so well.

For example, squirrels crossing a street and confronted by an oncoming car, will stop and decide whether to continue across, or turn around and go back. Unfortunately for them, they often choose poorly. Apparently, considering the possible unknown dangers ahead versus where they have come from, they will often turn back when they are only a few feet away from the relative safety of the curb, only to succumb to the deadlier danger of a car.

On the other hand, I well remember a particularly annoying squirrel in our front yard, eyeing the ripe peaches on our dwarf peach tree from his perch on a fence rail. He watched me yelling at him from the porch and considered his options. As I came down the steps, he leapt into the bush, grabbed a peach, and jumped back onto the fence rail. He then ran down the rail a ways, stopped, and chattered defiantly at me all the while holding onto that peach.

More recently, squirrels in our present back yard have provided both frustration and amusement for me in their clever ways to get at the peaches in our tree, after I had clamped a plastic drainpipe around the trunk to keep them from climbing into it.

Instinct and thinking: Brains big and small

Of course, research starting in the 60’s by Jane Goodall and others showed that chimpanzees and the other great apes can reason and use tools, and even communicate with us using sign language. More recent studies showed that chimpanzees were better at certain memory tests than humans. 1 And birds can remember after several months where they hid thousands of seeds in hundreds of locations. 2 Fortunately for the plants, their memory is not perfect (or, are they just being farmers?).

Laboratory rats learn to navigate mazes; crows learn to use vending machines. So, I don’t thing I will get any argument from you that these animals are not thinking. But how far down the evolutionary scale can we take this?

What about reptiles, or fish? Turtles don’t seem to be very bright; they try to climb over obstacles when they could more easily go around them. But, they are going somewhere. They smell and taste things to decide whether they might make a meal. Lizards will watch me carefully to assess whether I am a danger – no question here. Pond or aquarium fish learn to overcome their natural fear and recognize that a person is coming to feed them. This is not something that they would have in their natural habitat. Now think of this: That is a very small brain compared to other chordates (animals with a spinal chord) – about 1/15 as large relative to the size of the animal.

So, what is instinct, anyway?

Merriam Webster Dictionary defines instinct as:

    1. a way of behaving, thinking, or feeling that is not learned; a natural desire or tendency that makes you want to act in a particular way.
    2. something you know without learning it or thinking about it.
    3. a natural ability.

What are some examples of animal behavior that are instinct?

Obviously, all animals, including people, have instinctive behavior related to survival needs, such as eating and protecting themselves from predators. But let’s look at some interesting specifics.

Instinct and thinking: Domestic and wild

Dogs are social creatures. Wild dogs, such as wolves and coyotes tend to live in groups, and those groups have a social order. Belonging in a group seems to be instinctive. What is not so clear is whether some of the behaviors, such as dominant or submissive behavior, are instinctive or learned. The particular behavior is always the same, which might argue for instinct; however it could as easily be learned from observation of the group. Some dogs may decide to challenge the alpha dog. Not all do, so this is probably not an instinctive thing. Catching food? This is well documented as learned from their parents.

Domestic dogs are also social, but the family, which includes humans and often other animals, is now their social group. They are generally submissive relative to their humans. Domestic dogs are very sensitive to human cues.  Our tone of voice or visual cues indicate whether we might be angry at or approving of something the dog did. And, dogs seem to respond empathetically when their humans are upset. All these behaviors are without any training.

Domestic dogs seem to be smarter in some ways than their wild counterparts. For example, if you point to some morsel on the floor, they will go to it. Try this with a cat; they will look at your finger, not in the direction it is pointing. Dogs will do this automatically, without training. Apparently, it is instinctive behavior. However, domesticated wolves or coyotes do not respond in this way. 3 So, how did domestic dogs develop an instinctive behavior? The obvious answer is: It was learned at some point in the past, and that knowledge was passed down as instinct. How that happens is unknown.

The other most familiar domestic animal is the cat. One of the most obvious behaviors about our cats is that they bury their wastes. According to zoologist Joanne McGonagle 4, big cats in the wild (lions, tigers, leopards and jaguars) often do not bury their excrement. She attributes this as a way of signaling they are claiming a certain territory.  Smaller, weaker or more submissive wild cats do bury their feces. McGonagle sees this as a way of making sure the bigger cats do not feel challenged, and also to avoid attracting unwanted attention from predators to themselves or their young. I don’t know if we can be sure her reasons are correct, but they do make sense. Either way, if the instinctive behavior developed as a survival mechanism, it had to be learned at some point.

Consider chickens and other birds. We have had quite a few chickens over the last 30 years, and plenty of time to observe their behavior. One day I noticed the chickens were not out and about as they usually were on a nice, sunny day. Then, I heard a hawk flying overhead. As soon as the hawk had gone, out came the chickens, from under the bushes. I found that they did this whenever hawks were nearby. Other birds too, seek refuge in the bushes and trees when hawks are around. For that matter, so do the squirrels. How do they know the hawk is a danger? I don’t recall them reacting this way to vultures. Again, they didn’t need to be taught; it was instinctive knowledge.

What about those fish? Salmon somehow know where they came from and how to find their way back to spawn; instinctive behavior, but not based on geographic location. Perhaps it’s smell or some other sense, because if we move the baby fish to a new location, that becomes their spawning site.

Instincts are important to us all

All animals seem to know what predators they need to fear, whether they be wolves, cougars, sharks or amoebas. And even the predators have their own enemies to be wary of. Having instinctive responses are important to their survival and procreation; there is no question about that. But how that instinct is developed is a mystery.

Some people would claim that God is directing their every move and every thought. Only we, the chosen ones, the pinnacle of creation, have free will (see, “Is anything more amazing than the human brain? The basis of intelligence, Introduction“/). I don’t think so. More to come.

1,2. Barber, Nigel, 2018. “When Other Species Are Smarter,” Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-human-beast/201803/when-other-species-are-smarter

Barber references:
1. Inoue, S., and Matsuzawa, T. (2007). “Working memory of numerals in chimpanzees,” Current Biology, 17, R1004-R1005.

2. Lanner, R. M., 1996. Made for each other: A symbiosis of birds and pines. New York: Oxford University Press.

3. Barber, Nigel, 2010. “Why dogs are so different from wolves: Humans created dogs in their own image.” Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-human-beast/201011/why-dogs-are-so-different-wolves

4. McGonagle, Joanne, 2012. “10 reasons your cat might be going outside the litter box.” The Tiniest Tiger. https://conservationcubclub.com/2012/07/10-reasons-your-cat-might-be-going-outside-the-litter-box/

Is anything more amazing than the human brain?

The basis of intelligence – Introduction

Ken Piper

Those working on artificial intelligence often think they are close to exceeding the capability of the human brain. Recently, however, those studying the brain have discovered that its capability is much greater than previously thought. Individual neurons have been found to process information internally that was thought to require whole sections of the brain. 1,2,3

Humans like to think that we are the pinnacle of creation. We see ourselves as God’s focus, and our image of God is our own image. We are the center of our own vision of the universe. This despite that we know Earth is not the center of the solar system. The solar system is, in turn, not the center of our galaxy (thank God for that, considering the black holes) and the galaxy is one of billions of galaxies – at least.

Many of us believe that we are the only ones other than God that can reason, or comprehend our own existence. I have been in churches where the object of worship seems to be, not God, but the human intellect.

But, is anything more amazing than the human brain?

The human brain is large and very complex. Those who have mapped its connections have found that it is similarly complex to the mapping of the known universe.

Images credit: (L) Mark Miller, Brandeis University, of a neuron and connections in the brain of a mouse; (R) Virgo Consortium for Cosmological Supercomputer Simulations, of the large-scale structure of the Universe, via visualcomplexity.com and the New York Times.

We know that neurons have electrical impulses that apparently move information within them and that communication between neurons is transmitted chemically. How all that works to do all the processing and storage of information is unknown.

But we can also see that other animals have many of the capabilities that were once thought to be ours alone. Researchers have found that animals with far smaller brains can figure out how to make and use tools. Many have demonstrated compassion for others of their own kind and even others that are not. Are they self-aware? Maybe – several pass the mirror test (they can recognize that the image in the mirror is of themself), including some great apes, porpoises, orcas, an elephant, several species of birds and at least 3 species of ants. 4,5,6

Many animals also have capabilities that we do not have, although we may have in ages past. For example, migrating species know the seasons and where and when to migrate. They are also keenly aware of dangers in their environment, without being taught. This is usually attributed to instinct, whatever that really is. Saying it is instinct really means we don’t know how they know all this. Mammals that herd, birds that flock, and fish in schools seem to be able to think as one in their movements. 7,8

What about animals that have almost no brain, for example insects? Insects demonstrate complex behavior, especially those that are social, like ants and bees. Bees, in particular, are able to communicate complex information, such as where to find food. 9

No brain required?

Even simpler animals with no brain at all can do all the things necessary for survival and procreation. Is God guiding every movement or is something else going on?

Take that question all the way down to one-celled animals. They clearly have no brain; yet they move about purposefully, know what to eat and how to do it. How does a paramecium move its cilia? It has no muscles or nervous system to make them move. Yet they move in synchronicity to allow the beast to move about in search of food and to avoid predators. The most familiar one-celled animal, the amoeba, is a true shape shifter, using that capability for both locomotion and to encapsulate its meals. 10,11 It can even go after creatures larger than itself.

While we are at the cellular level, consider the individual cells within us (and other complex organisms). How do our white blood cells know where to go to battle infections? And how do they get there? How do sperm know how to get to the egg? How does the egg know to let in just one sperm, of the right species, and how to do that? And, back to the brain – how do those individual neurons do the amazing things they do?

Must we limit ourselves to the animal kingdom?

What about plants? They seem to have the ability to adapt to and even control their environment. They also have the ability to communicate, and respond to dangers. No brains here. How do they do it?

Bacteria can actively move about much like one-celled animals. They can sense food (something akin to smell) and actually have memory that helps them know whether they are moving in the right direction to find the food source. 12

Inside the cell

Let’s go sub-cellular. How do chromosomes know how to pair up and which is their corresponding “mate?” When it is time to reproduce through either mitosis or meiosis, which to do and how to do the dance? 13,14 And, who decides which stem cells become what type of cell?

Beyond life?

There is disagreement on whether viruses are living organisms. They do reproduce, but don’t do it by cell division; new viruses are assembled within a host cell. They cannot move about freely, but neither can most plants. They have genes, made from DNA or RNA. 15 Considering their construction, and how they act, I have to go with living. As to whether there is any intelligence or thinking going on, see the above paragraph on chromosomes.

Now to the extreme… What about those things we don’t consider as life – rocks and minerals. Snowflakes have a remarkable symmetry. Snowflakes and other minerals are able to find their corresponding molecules and form crystal structures, some even within “solid” rock. Yes, even solid rock is mostly space (see, “Conceiving the Inconceivable“). But still, they have to find their way. Are they somehow conscious of the presence of others of their own kind?

Back to the question:

“Is anything more amazing than the human brain?” Certainly, it’s not a new question. Consider this quote from Charles Darwin:

It is certain that there may be extraordinary activity with an extremely small absolute mass of nervous matter; thus the wonderfully diversified instincts, mental powers, and affections of ants are notorious, yet their cerebral ganglia are not so large as the quarter of a small pin’s head. Under this point of view, the brain of an ant is one of the most marvelous atoms of matter in the world, perhaps more so than the brain of man.
– Charles Darwin, 1871.

This article, an introduction, has mostly been questions. I will delve into some of those questions in subsequent articles.

Meanwhile, to those who think artificial intelligence can compete with the real thing: When computer scientists are able to make something the size of an amoeba or paramecium that can do what they do, then maybe you are onto something.

Similarly, to those who think they can develop sub-cell sized machines that can travel through our bloodstream and fix problems: Do you really think you can compete with the abilities of the white blood cells and other sub-cellular immune systems?

References

  1. Fan, Shelly. “Is the Brain More Powerful Than We Thought? Here Comes the Science,” Singularity Hub, 22 Mar. 2017, https://singularityhub.com/2017/03/22/is-the-brain-more-powerful-than-we-thought-here-comes-the-science/.
  2. Humphries, Mark. “Your Cortex Contains 17 Billion Computers: Neural networks of neural networks,” The Spike, 12 Feb. 2018, https://medium.com/the-spike/your-cortex-contains-17-billion-computers-9034e42d34f2.
  3. Wilson, Clare. “Your brain is like 100 billion mini-computers all working together,” New Scientist, 18 Oct. 2018, https://www.newscientist.com/article/2182987-your-brain-is-like-100-billion-mini-computers-all-working-together/.
  4. Pachniewska, Amanda. “List of Animals That Have Passed the Mirror Test,” Animal Cognition, 15 Apr. 2015, http://www.animalcognition.org/2015/04/15/list-of-animals-that-have-passed-the-mirror-test/.
  5. Wald, Chelsea. “What Do Animals Think They See When They Look in the Mirror?Slate, 24 Oct. 2014, https://slate.com/technology/2014/10/what-do-animals-see-in-the-mirror-self-recognition-and-social-behavior-video.html.
  6. Mirror test,” Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirror_test.
  7. Winter, Dylan (www.keepturningleft.co.uk ) “Amazing Starlings Murmuration,” YouTube, uploaded by raisingmaggie, 13 Nov. 2010. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eakKfY5aHmY.
  8. The design of the schooling fish,” 4 June 2015, Hashem.com, https://hashem.com/amazing-facts-about-schooling-fish/.
  9. What’s the Waggle Dance? And Why Do Honeybees Do It?YouTube, Smithsonian Channel, 20 May 2016, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LU_KD1enR3Q.
  10. A dramatic description of amoeba lifestyle,” YouTube, Uploaded by mantismundi 15 Jun. 2017, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fl5cF-vMoBs.
  11. Amoeba meets Stentor,” YouTube, Uploaded by KambizMT 13 Oct. 2013, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FcCvhYmjaXE.
  12. Franklin, Joshua. “On the Hunt: How Bacteria Find Food,” Beacon, 20 Jun. 2018, https://www3.beacon-center.org/blog/2018/06/20/on-the-hunt-how-bacteria-find-food.
  13. Real Microscopic Mitosis (MRC),” YouTube, Uploaded by Medical Research Community 25 Mar. 2013, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L61Gp_d7evo.
  14. Meiosis,” YouTube, Uploaded by pez073 23 Apr. 2009, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0utf9puEPXs.
  15. Introduction to viruses,” Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Introduction_to_viruses.